Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Can we conclude from "A man runs with his dog at a dog show." that "The cat was in the show."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Now, let's be accurate as possible. Some thinking first:

answer:We cannot conclude that "The cat was in the show" from the statement "A man runs with his dog at a dog show." The given statement only provides information about a man and his dog participating in the dog show. It does not mention or imply anything about a cat being present or participating in the show. Therefore, the answer is: - no

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Student: Test for natural language inference. Premise: "This man is in a restaurant that has slot machines." Hypothesis: "The man is at the slot machines in the restaurant." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell. Teacher: Let's think:

answer:Step 1: Understand the premise and hypothesis. Premise: "This man is in a restaurant that has slot machines." Hypothesis: "The man is at the slot machines in the restaurant." Step 2: Break down the information given in the premise. - There is a man. - The man is in a restaurant. - The restaurant has slot machines. Step 3: Break down the information given in the hypothesis. - There is a man. - The man is in a restaurant. - The man is at the slot machines. Step 4: Compare the information in the premise and hypothesis. - Both mention a man and a restaurant. - The premise states the restaurant has slot machines, but it does not specifically say that the man is at the slot machines. - The hypothesis claims the man is at the slot machines in the restaurant. Step 5: Determine if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise. - The premise only states that the man is in a restaurant with slot machines, not that he is using them or standing next to them. - The hypothesis makes an assumption about the man's location in the restaurant (at the slot machines). Conclusion: Based on the comparison, it is not possible to tell if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise, as the premise does not provide enough information about the man's exact location in the restaurant.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Teacher: One of the following sentences is nonsensical. Which one is it? Options: - Sentence A: "Something you will find at a zoo is a Giraffe" - Sentence B: "Something you will find at a zoo is a Lathe" Student: There is no likehood or finding a Lathe at the zoo. The answer is Sentence B. question in book: Which of the following two sentences does not make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "he was sent to jail for stealing" - Sentence B: "he was sent to restaurant for stealing" standard solution: A restaurant is for dining and isn't a prison. The answer is Sentence B. [TEACHER] Of the following two sentences, which one is against common sense? Options: - Sentence A: "All living people have legs." - Sentence B: "All living people have heads." [Student] Some people were born with no legs and some others lost them during their lives. The answer is Sentence A. Teacher: One of the following sentences is nonsensical. Which one is it? Options: - Sentence A: "There are many whales in the swamp." - Sentence B: "There are many insects in the swamp." Student: A whale is too big for a shallow swamp. The answer is Sentence A. question in book: Which of the following sentences is nonsensical? Options: - Sentence A: "The paint on the wall is dripping." - Sentence B: "The paint on the wall is floating." standard solution: Paint can not float unless your in space. The answer is Sentence B. Teacher: Of the following two sentences, which one is against common sense? Options: - Sentence A: "A person doesn't want to fall on their face" - Sentence B: "a person want to fall on their face" Student:

answer:Falling on one's face can cause injury and pain, which people generally want to avoid. The answer is Sentence B.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. If "Two men jumping outside on the grass." does that mean that "Two men are playing a jumping game outside."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no -- Two men jumping on the grass doesn't imply that they are playing a game. There are other reasons they could be jumping.. The answer is: it is not possible to tell. ---- Test for natural language inference. Premise: "A very colorful bus is pulled off to the side of the road as its passengers load." Hypothesis: "A stopped bus is picking people up." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell -- The bus could be just dropping people off and not necessarily be picking people up.. The answer is: it is not possible to tell. ---- If "Two girls admiring jewelry worn by someone on their hands." does that mean that "The girls are looking at the jewelry."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no --

answer:Two girls admiring jewelry worn by someone on their hands indicates that they are observing and appreciating the jewelry. The answer is: yes.

Released under the Bard License.

has loaded