question:Given the question: Television drama's whole point is to bring you through an often slow start, followed by a complex development to a point where there are two or three potential dénouements before, "Cut!", it is the end of the episode and you will have to await the "right answer" in the following week's show. This post came to me at 10pm last night, on Day 16 of this challenge, after a day of holidaying in London and with my head (and feet) too weary to put finger to touchscreen. Mrs Mc and I had just watched another live instalment of Broadchurch, murder mystery extraordinaire, particularly since in the second series there is no actual fresh murder to investigate. The verdict is about to be given on the accused killer from Series 1 when the inevitable happens... Cue title music. This moment has even gained a moniker in British homes, based on the theme tune to the real masters of the four-times-a-week cliffhanger, London-based soap opera Eastenders. It's call a "ba...ba...ba...ba, ba, ba-ba-ba-ba" (YouTube will provide overseas readers with auditory explanation). Eastenders is such a master of writing in the perfect pace that every 28 minute episode ends with a tantalising screen freeze on the latest shocked face / smirking baddy / confused victim. For really big stories the cliffhanger can last significantly longer. This week, to celebrate the show's 30 year birthday, we will finally find out the answer to a question unanswered for the past 14 months: "Who killed Lucy Beale?" Now, most classrooms do not involve murder, incest, dodgy deals and danger, but "good teaching" encourages a type of pacing that totally ignores the ingredients that have millions in the edges of their seats every day: the good old cliffhanger. In fact, we see teachers giving away the punchline at the beginning: "Today we are learning this:..." Question: What is probably true about the episode of EastEnders that was celebrating the show's 30 year birthday? Options: - not enough information - probably a medium amount of people watched the show - probably it was widely watched in Britain - probably not many watched the show === The correct answer is The answer is:

question:Question: I have a test where I am given the following article, what is an answer for the question: What's the first name of the person whose infatuation compromises the Sox performance? ? Wives and girlfriends sit together at a Sox game to watch Wacky Waters pitch. He's a fun-loving guy who is delighted to learn that Hollywood star Pepita Zorita is at today's game, selling kisses for charity. Wacky promptly borrows money from team publicity man Updyke to buy 300 worth. In the grandstand, catcher Hippo Jones's wife Hazel and the other women are concerned. Wacky is the best pitcher in baseball when he concentrates on what he's doing, but whenever a pretty girl turns his head, a distracted Wacky suddenly can't throw the ball over the plate. The wives want the Sox to be in the World Series so their husbands will receive bonus money. Sure enough, Wacky's infatuation with Pepita begins a run of bad luck for him and the Sox at the ballpark. On the train, the wives protest until Wacky discloses that he and Pepita secretly ran off to get married. While they are happy for the couple, Hazel schemes to have a Hollywood producer require Pepita's presence to shoot a movie there. This could keep Wacky focused on baseball until the World Series. Pepita finishes the film faster than expected. She hurries to Kansas City to see Wacky and the Sox, so the wives take matters into their own hands, tying up Pepita in a hotel room against her will. Wacky eventually wins the World Series for the Sox, but this time, it's only because the woman he loves is there. Answer:

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Premise: The Monastery of the Temptation, said to be on the spot where Jesus was tempted by the Devil for 40 days and nights, clings to the mountainside. Hypothesis: The monastery still exists and is a popular spot. Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

question:You are an AI assistant. Provide a detailed answer so user don’t need to search outside to understand the answer. Is there a negative or positive tone to this product review? === Title: Not serious but not funny. Flat characters. Review: I've liked a couple short stories by this author quite a bit but I couldn't finish this book (I did get more than halfway through by forcing myself).Most stories are either serious or funny and this story was neither. I found the characters very uninteresting, especially the main character who seems to have some sense of honor but could just be called "Generic Witless Good Guy With Special Powers He Has No Idea How To Use".The final thing that stopped me reading the book was the bad pun on the family names of :Locke, Bolte, Seale, and Keye.I would say if you're looking for a serious ghost story or story about the supernatural, DO NOT read this book. If you're looking for a funny ghost story DO NOT read this book. Actually I'm not sure why anyone would want to read this tepid, urban fantasy. Answer: Answer: