Bard

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. "Despite living in New York for most of his adult life, Nikola Tesla held an Austrian visa until he died." Is the above claim true? Options: - yes - no no Nikola Tesla became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1891. **Q** Is the following sentence factually correct? "The Rosemary plant is a medicinal plant currently practiced in alternative medicine." Options: - yes - no **A** yes Factual findings recorded in early medicine pertaining to Rosemary. "Plats subdivide neighborhoods into smaller lots." Is the above claim true? Options: - yes - no yes This is one of the primary uses of a plat. **Q** Claim: "Canada Post serves cheap and quality educational services in Canada." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no **A** no Canada Post is an well-known federal organization in Canada and it did never serve educational services there. Claim: "Chicago Public Schools educate students in Chicago, Illinois." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no yes Chicago Public Schools is a school district in Cook County, Illinois and Chicago is in Cook County. Is the following a factual statement? "Amaterasu ordered her brother, Tsukuyomi to go down to the terrestrial world and visit the goddess Ukemochi." Options: - yes - no

answer:yes This statement is based on the Japanese mythological story where Amaterasu, the sun goddess, sends her brother Tsukuyomi, the moon god, to visit the goddess Ukemochi.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Given the sentence "Employee's are trying to fix the tangled nets for the fishing boat." can we conclude that "The people are setting fire to the boat."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Step by step answer:

answer:Step 1: Analyze the given sentence. The given sentence is, "Employee's are trying to fix the tangled nets for the fishing boat." Step 2: Identify the key information in the sentence. - The employees are working on fixing the nets. - They are doing this for a fishing boat. Step 3: Compare the key information to the statement in question. The statement in question is, "The people are setting fire to the boat." Step 4: Evaluate if the given sentence supports the statement in question. The given sentence does not mention anything about setting fire to the boat. Instead, it states that the employees are fixing tangled nets for the fishing boat. Step 5: Provide a justified answer. Based on the comparison and evaluation, the answer is "no" because the given sentence does not support the statement in question.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Which of the following two sentences does not make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "Lina put a fish in the toaster." - Sentence B: "Lina put bread in the toaster." Hmmm, let me think. I want to lay out the solution in details.

answer:To determine which of the two sentences does not make sense, let's analyze each sentence individually and consider the context and purpose of the objects mentioned. Sentence A: "Lina put a fish in the toaster." Step 1: Identify the main objects - fish and toaster. Step 2: Determine the purpose of a toaster - to toast bread or similar items. Step 3: Evaluate if the action makes sense - putting a fish in a toaster is not a typical or intended use for a toaster. It could potentially cause damage to the toaster or create a fire hazard. Therefore, this action does not make sense. Sentence B: "Lina put bread in the toaster." Step 1: Identify the main objects - bread and toaster. Step 2: Determine the purpose of a toaster - to toast bread or similar items. Step 3: Evaluate if the action makes sense - putting bread in a toaster is the intended use of a toaster, as it is designed to toast bread. Therefore, this action makes sense. Based on the analysis, Sentence A: "Lina put a fish in the toaster" does not make sense, as it is not a typical or intended use of a toaster and could potentially cause damage or hazards.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Leo: Can we conclude from "A man in black suspenders fixing an elevator while a person stands above him." that "A man in black suspenders is enjoying a cup of coffee while riding the elevator."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Mei: OK, So, let's think first... Me:

answer:No, we cannot conclude that "A man in black suspenders is enjoying a cup of coffee while riding the elevator" from the given statement "A man in black suspenders fixing an elevator while a person stands above him." The initial statement only provides information about the man fixing the elevator and does not mention anything about him enjoying a cup of coffee or riding the elevator.